TSI ELAR Study Guide
Inferences and Evidence
Not every idea in a passage is stated directly. Authors provide details and expect readers to use them to reach logical conclusions.
The key rule
A good inference goes beyond what the passage directly states, without going beyond what the evidence supports.
Explicit information vs. inference
Explicit information
Stated directly in the text.
Inference
Something you determine from the information provided.
The passage never states that conclusion, but a reasonable reader connects the clues to reach it.
Making reasonable inferences
An inference must be supported by evidence, but it doesn’t need to be proven with absolute certainty.
Ask yourself
Which conclusion is most reasonable based on what the passage tells me?
Example
Question: What can reasonably be inferred about Andre?
Show answer
Answer: B. Arriving early, taking notes, and reviewing the schedule all show effort. The passage gives no evidence for A, C, or D.
You can’t conclude she needed money. Perhaps parking was expensive, she wanted to reduce her environmental impact, or the train was more convenient. Your inference comes from the text, not from what you think probably happens in real life.
Combining clues
The strongest inferences come from combining several details rather than relying on one sentence.
When making an inference, ask
- What details seem important?
- What do those details have in common?
- What conclusion explains them best?
Finding supporting evidence
Some questions reverse the process: they give you a conclusion and ask which detail is the best evidence for it.
Given conclusion
The passage suggests that Carla is becoming more independent.
Strong evidence
Carla decided to call the repair shop herself instead of asking her father to handle the problem as he usually did.
Directly shows her taking on something she used to depend on someone else for.
Weak evidence
Carla recently celebrated a birthday.
Getting older is loosely associated with independence but doesn’t demonstrate it.
Strong evidence vs. related information
An answer choice can be related to the topic without actually supporting the conclusion. If you need evidence that a character is generous:
Related, but not evidence
The character has a high-paying job. This describes finances, not generosity.
Evidence
The character gives time, money, or resources to help someone else.
Always ask
Does this detail actually prove or strongly support the idea in the question?
Inferences in informational texts
Inference questions aren’t limited to fiction. You may draw conclusions from facts in an informational passage.
The numbers don’t state that conclusion, but they provide evidence for it.
TSI strategy: use the evidence test
When you think you’ve found the right inference, ask
What evidence would I point to if someone asked me to prove this?
If you can immediately identify relevant details, your inference is well supported. If your explanation starts with “I just think…” or “This probably happened because…”, you may be adding an assumption that isn’t in the passage.
For evidence questions, work in the opposite direction:
The strongest answer isn’t merely connected to the same subject. It gives a logical reason to believe the conclusion is true.
Textual evidence + logical reasoning = inference
Both parts are necessary. If an answer requires information the author never provides, it’s too speculative. Choose the conclusion that stays closest to the evidence in the passage.
